Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Founding Associations
  • Ask for Assistance
  • Login
CALEA® logo CALEA®
  • About Us
    • The Commission
    • What is CALEA?
    • CALEA Commissioners
      • Role and Responsibilities
      • Board of Commissioners
      • Board Structure
      • Past Commissioners
    • CALEA Staff
    • Accreditation Process
    • Provide Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Programs
    • Law Enforcement
      • Standards
        • Standards Titles
      • Benefits
      • Cost
      • Eligibility
      • Process
      • Enrollment
    • Communications
      • Standards
        • Standards Titles
      • Benefits
      • Eligibility
      • Cost
      • Process
      • Enrollment
    • Training Academy
      • Standards
        • Standards Titles
      • Benefits
      • Eligibility
      • Cost
      • Process
      • Enrollment
    • Campus Security
      • Standards
        • Standard Titles
      • Benefits
      • Eligibility
      • Cost
      • Process
      • Enrollment
  • Resources
    • Accreditation
    • Gold Standard Assessment
    • Articles on Accreditation
      • Risk Management
        • Accreditation Saves Money
        • Risk Management Studies
        • IRMA Report
    • CACE
    • CALEA Agency Support Program
      • CASP Eligibility Criteria
    • CALEA Client Database
    • CALEA Regions
    • Partners and Associations
    • PACs
    • Did You Know...?
    • PowerDMS FAQs
    • Program Managers' Corner
  • Career Opps
    • View Ads
    • Post an Ad
  • Assessors
    • What is a CALEA Assessor
    • Assessor Application Process
  • Awards
    • Accreditation with Excellence
    • Award Application
    • Egon Bittner Award
    • James V. Cotter Award
    • Meritorious Award
    • President's Award
    • Tri-Arc Award
  • News
    • CALEA Calendar
    • CALEA News
    • CALEA Update Magazine
      • Featured Articles
      • Archive
    • AccreditationWorks!
    • Annual Reports
    • CALEA E-Communiqué
      • Archive
    • Current Headlines
    • CEO Changes
  • Forums
    • Public
    • Forum Help
Home
  • English
  • Español
login
  • Conferences
  • My CALEA Store

Standard Titles

Printer-friendly version

CALEA® Standards for Campus Security Agencies

 

Below is a comprehensive list of the titles of all 293 Standards that constitute the CALEA® Campus Security Accreditation Program.

1  Role and Authority

1.1  Campus Security Agency Role

1.1.1  Understanding of regulations and citizen rights
1.1.2  Code of ethics and training
1.1.3  Agency role in diversion and referral programs

1.2  Limits of Authority

1.2.1  Authority of agency personnel
1.2.2  Authority to carry and use weapons
1.2.3  Compliance with Constitutional requirements
1.2.4  Search and seizure
1.2.5  Legal authority to detain
1.2.6  Use of discretion
1.2.7  Searches of persons
1.2.8  Bias based profiling

2  Use of Force

2.1  Use of Force

2.1.1  Authority to use force
2.1.2  Use of deadly force
2.1.3  Warning shots
2.1.4  Less lethal weapons use
2.1.5  Medical aid after use of force
2.1.6  Written report after use of force
2.1.7  Administrative review of use of force reports
2.1.8  Removal from line-duty
2.1.9  Authorized weapons and ammunition
2.1.10  Proficiency in use of authorized weapons
2.1.11  Annual weapons training and proficiency
2.1.12  Issuance and instruction on use of force polices
2.1.13  Annual analysis of use of force reports

3  Direction

3.1   Direction
3.1.1  Authority of (agency) Chief Executive Officer
3.1.2  Command protocol
3.1.3  Lawful order of superior
3.1.4  Procedures for communication and cooperation

3.2  Written Directions

3.2.1  Written directive system
3.2.2  Dissemination and storage of written directives

4   Contractual Agreements for Campus Security Services

4.1  Contractual Agreements
4.1.1  Security services provided to the institution

5  Agency Jurisdiction and Mutual Aid

5.1  Agency Jurisdiction and Memorandums of Agreement

5.1.1  Jurisdiction boundaries
5.1.2  Interagency agreement with concurrent service areas
5.1.3  Emergency assistance agreements

6  Organization and Administration

6.1  Organizational Structure

6.1.1  Organizational structure available to personnel
6.1.2  Organizational chart
6.1.3  Employee accountable to one supervisor
6.1.4  One supervisor control
6.1.5  Responsibility, accountability and authority
6.1.6  Supervisors accountable to employees

6.2  General Management and Administration

6.2.1  Administrative reporting program
6.2.2  System for accreditation activities reporting
6.2.3  Policy for software introduction to computers
6.2.4  Notification of potential liability incidents
6.2.5  Documented risk assessment and analysis

7  Administrative Functions

7.1  Planning and Research

7.1.1  Activities of planning and research function
7.1.2  Planning and research placement and access to CEO
7.1.3  Multiyear plan

7.2  Goals and objectives

7.2.1  Goals and objectives for organizational components
7.2.2  System to evaluate goals and objectives

7.3  Incident Analysis

7.3.1  Incident analysis procedures

8  Fiscal Management and Agency Property

8.1  Fiscal Management

8.1.1  CEO fiscal management authority
8.1.2  Security expenses as part of other departments

8.2  Budget

8.2.1  Budget process and responsibility
8.2.2  Components prepare budget recommendations

8.3  Purchasing

8.3.1  Procedures for purchase of equipment

8.4  Accounting

8.4.1  Accounting system
8.4.2  Cash funds or account requirements
8.4.3  Independent audit of fiscal activities

8.5  Agency Owned Property

8.5.1  Inventory and property control procedures
8.5.2  Procedures  for issuing agency property
8.5.3  Responsibility for property operational readiness

9  Clery Act

9.1  Administration
9.1.1  Clery Act responsibility

10  Allocation and Distribution of Personnel

10.1  Allocation and Distribution of Personnel

10.1.1  Position management system
10.1.2  Workload assessment

11  Classification and Delineation of Duties and Responsibilities

11.1  Task Analysis

11.1.1  Task analysis

11.2  Classification

11.2.1  Classification plan
11.2.2  Job descriptions

12  Compensation, Benefits, and Conditions of Work

12.1  Compensation

12.1.1  Salary program

12.2  Benefits

12.2.1  Leave program
12.2.2  Personnel programs
12.2.3  Employee support services program
12.2.4  Assistance for job injury or death
12.2.5  Provision of clothing and equipment
12.2.6  Employee Assistance Program
12.2.7  Personnel identification

12.3  Conditions of Work

12.3.1  Physical examinations policy
12.3.2  Health and physical fitness policy
12.2.3  Fitness and wellness program

13  Collective Bargaining

13.1  Collective Bargaining and Contract Management

13.1.1  Agency role in collective bargaining process
13.1.2  Responsibilities for labor agreement

14  Grievance Procedures

14.1  Grievance Procedures

14.1.1  Grievance procedure
14.1.2  Position for grievance coordination and records
14.1.3  Analysis of grievances

15  Disciplinary Procedures

15.1  Disciplinary Procedures

15.1.1  Code of conduct and appearance guidelines
15.1.2  Recognizing employees for exceptional performance
15.1.3  Sexual and unlawful harassment
15.1.4  Disciplinary system established
15.1.5  Role and authority of supervisors
15.1.6  Disciplinary appeals procedures
15.1.7  Information supplied to dismissed employee
15.1.8  Procedures for maintenance of disciplinary records

16  Recruitment

16.1  Administrative Practices and Procedures

16.1.1  Participation in recruitment program
16.1.2  Knowledgeable recruitment personnel

16.2  Equal Employment Opportunity and Recruitment

16.2.1  Recruitment plan
16.2.2  Equal Employment Opportunity plan

16.3  Job Announcements and Publicity

16.3.1  Job announcement and recruiting notices
16.3.2  Rejection of applications

17  Selection

17.1  Professional and Legal Requirements

17.1.1  Elements of the selection process
17.1.2  Criteria and qualifications are job related
17.1.3  Selection process results evaluated in uniform manner
17.1.4  Candidates informed in writing
17.1.5  Disposition of records for candidates not hired
17.1.6  Storage and disposal of selection material

17.2  Administrative Practices and Procedures

17.2.1  Background investigation for all positions
17.2.2  Background investigators trained
17.2.3  Background information retention policy
17.2.4  Candidates provided list of polygraph questions
17.2.5  Polygraph examiner trained
17.2.6  Results of polygraph not single determinant
17.2.7  Fitness for duty; substance abuse testing
17.2.8  Psychological examination for armed positions
17.2.9  Retention of medical and psychological exams
17.2.10  Six-month probationary period for entry-level
17.2.11  Background investigation of students, faculty and staff

18  Training and Career Development

18.1  Administration

18.1.1  Training committee
18.1.2  Attendance requirements for training
18.1.3  Reimbursements for training
18.1.4  Lesson plans for all training
18.1.5  Remedial training policy
18.1.6  Updating employee training records
18.1.7  Records for training class

18.2  Academy

18.2.1  Provisions for administration and operation
18.2.2  Academy facility requirements
18.2.3  Agency relationship with outside academy
18.2.4  Outside academy and agency policy training

18.3  Training Instructors

18.3.1  Instructor minimum training

18.4  Recruit Training

18.4.1  Armed officer training prior to assignment
18.4.2  Agency training program design
18.4.3  Field training program

18.5  In-Service, Shift Briefing, Advanced, and Specialized Training

18.5.1  Annual retraining, including legal updates
18.5.2  Shift briefing training
18.5.3  Accreditation information
18.5.4  Accreditation manager training
18.5.5  Assignments requiring specialized training

18.6  Training for Personnel Without Security Responsibilities

18.6.1  New hire information for persons with no security responsibility
18.6.2  Positions requiring pre and in-service training

18.7  Career Development

18.7.1  Personnel conducting career development activities
18.7.2  Promoted personnel training
18.7.3  Career development program

19  Promotion

19.1  Professional and Legal Requirements

19.1.1  Agency role in the promotion process
19.1.2  Administering agency role in promotion process
19.1.3  Promotion process description
19.1.4  Hiring management personnel without selection process
19.1.5  Elements promotion are job-related and nondiscriminatory
19.1.6  Announcement of promotional process
19.1.7  Criteria and procedures for eligibility lists
19.1.8  Six-month probationary period with promotions

20  Performance Evaluation

20.1  Administration

20.1.1  Performance evaluation system defined
20.1.2  Documented annual evaluation for each employee
20.1.3  Entry-level evaluation required quarterly
20.1.4  Evaluation criteria specific to assignment
20.1.5  Evaluation system requirements
20.1.6  Unsatisfactory performance 90 day notice
20.1.7  Rating period employee counseling
20.1.8  Raters evaluated regarding ratings given
20.1.9  Personnel Early Warning System established

21  Patrol

21.1  Administration
21.1.1  Patrol administrative issues described
21.1.2  Methods for shift briefing
21.1.3  Operation of special purpose vehicles
21.1.4  Agency-owned or controlled animals
21.1.5  Campus escort service
21.1.6  Emergency notification system

21.2  Operations

21.2.1  Procedures for responding to calls
21.2.2  First responder notification in emergencies
21.2.3  Adult missing persons
21.2.4  Missing, abducted, abandoned  juveniles and children
21.2.5  Persons suspected of suffering from mental illness
21.2.6  Procedures for handling juveniles
21.2.7  Active gunman and active terrorism
21.2.8  Need for intervention with student

21.3  Equipment

21.3.1  Patrol vehicles must have emergency warning lights
21.3.2  Patrol vehicle equipment and supplies
21.3.3  Vehicle safety restraint device use required
21.3.4  Specifications for equipment and apparel
21.3.5  Protective vests and guidelines for wear
21.3.6  Computerized mobile data access procedures
21.3.7  In-car audio or video recording systems
21.3.8  Responsibility for security cameras
21.3.9  Fixed location emergency only phones

21.4  Medical Centers

21.4.1  Agency role in patrolling medical center
21.4.2  Agency personnel assigned to medical center
21.4.3  Procedures when agency is first response

21.5  Research Intensive Facilities

21.5.1  Agency plan for response
21.5.2  Hazard awareness training and specialized equipment

22  Incident Investigation

22.1  Administration

22.1.1  Case file management
22.1.2  Accountability of investigations
22.1.3  Suspicious incidents and criminal information

22.2  Operations

22.2.1  Preliminary investigations
22.2.2  Investigators at shift briefing
22.2.3  Processing reports of vice, drugs and organized crime

22.3  Administrative Investigations

22.3.1  Administrative investigations procedures

23  Crime/Loss Prevention and Campus Involvement

23.1  Crime and Loss Prevention

23.1.1  Crime and loss protection activities
23.1.2  Crime and loss protection liaison
23.1.3  Crime prevention and public safety development in-put
23.1.4  Personnel trained in CPTED

23.2  Campus Community Involvement

23.2.1  Community involvement activities
23.2.2  Community involvement report
23.2.3  Procedures for transmitting information
23.2.4  Survey of community perceptions and opinions
23.2.5  Survey summary provided to CEO

24  Critical Incidents, Special Operations, and Homeland Security

24.1  Critical Incidents

24.1.1  Position for critical incident planning
24.1.2  All Hazard plan
24.1.3  Command function responsibilities
24.1.4  Operations function responsibilities
24.1.5  Planning function responsibilities
24.1.6  Logistics function responsibilities
24.1.7  Finance function responsibilities
24.1.8  Equipment readiness inspection
24.1.9  All Hazard plan training

24.2  Special Operations

24.2.1  VIP security plan
24.2.2  Special event plan

24.3  Homeland Security

24.3.1  Terrorism information liaison
24.3.2  Relaying terrorism information
24.3.3  Terrorism awareness information
24.3.4  Awareness training for hazardous materials

25  Internal Affairs

25.1   Organizational Integrity

25.1.1  All complaints investigated
25.1.2  Maintenance and security of complaint records
25.1.3  Position reports to CEO
25.1.4  Complaint procedures available to public
25.1.5  Summary of investigations available to public

25.2  Complaint Procedures

25.2.1  Categories of complaints assigned
25.2.2  CEO notified of complaints
25.2.3  Time limits for investigations
25.2.4  Complainant formed of status
25.2.5  Written allegations issued to employee
25.2.6  Internal affairs conditions concerning employees
25.2.7  Employee relieved from duty
25.2.8  Conclusion of fact for each investigation

26  Inspectional Services

26.1  Line Inspections

26.1.1  Line inspections

26.2  Staff Inspections

26.2.1  Staff inspection

27  Public Information

27.1   Public Information

27.1.1  Public information function
27.1.2  Media involved in policy development
27.1.3  Media access controls

28  Victim Assistance

28.1  Administration

28.1.1  Rights of victims and witnesses
28.1.2  Review of victim/witness needs and services
28.1.3  Role in victim/witness assistance

28.2  Operations

28.1.1  Victim/witness information available
28.1.2  Assistance to threatened or intimidated victim/witness
28.1.3  Procedures for notifying next-of-kin

29  Traffic

29.1  Traffic Responsibilities

29.1.1  Parking enforcement activities
29.1.2  Collision scene responsibilities
29.1.3  Traffic engineering activities
29.1.4  Traffic direction and control coordination procedures

29.2  Ancillary Services

29.2.1  Assistance to motorists
29.2.2  Hazardous roadway conditions
29.2.3  Towing and abandon vehicle procedures
29.2.4  Traffic safety material

30  Legal Process

30.1  Legal Process

30.1.1  Role in service of legal process

31  Communications

31.1  Administration

31.1.1  Responsibility with shared communications entity
31.1.2  FCC license and regulations

31.2  Operations

31.2.1  TDD telephone access
31.2.2  Continuous two-way communications
31.2.3  Procedures for obtaining and recording information
31.2.4  Communications procedures
31.2.5  Communications personnel access to resources
31.2.6  Communications center procedures for call response
31.2.7  Victim/witness requests
31.2.8  Playback of recorded communications
31.2.9  Alternative communications procedures
31.2.10  Emergency messages
31.2.11  Misdirected emergency calls
31.2.12  Alarm monitoring or response
31.2.13  First-aid instruction

31.3  Facilities and Equipment

31.3.1  Security measures for communications center
31.3.2  Alternate source of electrical power
31.3.3  Telephone system separation of emergency calls
31.3.4  Joint public-safety two-way radio equipment

32  Central Records

32.1  Administration

32.1.1  Privacy and security of central records
32.1.2  Juvenile records
32.1.3  Records retention schedule
32.1.4  Crime reporting responsibilities
32.1.5  Report status procedures
32.1.6  Security of central records computer systems
32.1.7  Victim/witness or criminal history records security

32.2  Field Reporting System

32.2.1  Field reporting system
32.2.2  Incidents requiring a report
32.2.3  Case-numbering system
32.2.4  Distribution of reports and records

32.3  Records

32.3.1  Master name index
32.3.2  Records maintenance requirements
32.3.3  Traffic records system requirements
32.3.4  Traffic citations records
32.3.5  Records maintained in agency components

33  Collection of Evidence and Incident Documentation

33.1  Evidence and Incident Documentation

33.1.1  Preserving physical evidence
33.1.2  Photography and videotaping procedures
33.1.3  Computer seizure procedures

34  Property and Evidence Control

34.1  Administration and Operation

34.1.1  Procedures for receiving all property
34.1.2  Secure property storage and access
34.1.3  Storage when property room is closed
34.1.4  Records reflect status of property
34.1.5  Documented inspections, inventory and audits
34.1.6  Final disposition of property

Share this

Programs

  • Law Enforcement
    • Standards
      • Standards Titles
    • Benefits
    • Cost
    • Eligibility
    • Process
    • Enrollment
  • Communications
    • Standards
      • Standards Titles
    • Benefits
    • Eligibility
    • Cost
    • Process
    • Enrollment
  • Training Academy
    • Standards
      • Standards Titles
    • Benefits
    • Eligibility
    • Cost
    • Process
    • Enrollment
  • Campus Security
    • Standards
      • Standard Titles
    • Benefits
    • Eligibility
    • Cost
    • Process
    • Enrollment

Client Testimonials

"The confidence in our department has increased tremendously throughout our community since becoming an accredited agency."

Read More

—Former Chief Harry Rilling, Norwalk (CT) Police Department

“The Accreditation Process provides the best and the most credible roadmap for any law enforcement agency in pursuit of professional excellence. It will be the benchmark for policing in the twenty-first century.”   Lafourche Parish (LA) Sheriff’s Office has been CALEA Accredited since 2000.

Read More

—Sheriff Craig Webre, Lafourche Parish (LA) Sheriff’s Office, Past President - National Sheriffs’ Association

“CALEA Accreditation inspires public confidence in our agency, as well as assures that our department is up-to-date on police initiatives and administrative practices. Among the areas of particular importance addressed by CALEA, are the delivery of services to our citizens and the emphasis on inter-agency cooperation. CALEA provides a means of checks and balances that confirms the successful tactics we have in place.”  Miami PD  has been CALEA Accredited since 2003.

Read More

—Former Chief John Timoney Miami (FL) PD, Past President-Police Executive Research Forum

"The new two person on-site was fantastic. The interaction that occurred between the team and the community along with members of the agency made it easier for all to accept accreditation and to share what it meant to them. Accreditation makes it easier for the Sheriff's Office to provide better service to the citizens in our community."

Read More

—John C. Bittick, Monroe County Sheriff’s Office, Forsyth, Georgia

"Through improved policies and procedures, both the police department and the Communications Division were better able to  serve the community and its members.  There is a trust between the community and the members of the department because we are responsive to them and the needs of the community. Standards mean trust."

Read More

—Assistant Chief Michael Webb, Abington (PA) Police Department

"From start to finish, it's the change in process that is most obvious when working with CALEA. This change offers agencies the opportunity for improved transparency and delivery of services to the communities served. I would tell any chief that if he/she steps up to the table, the end result will be a better department for both members and citizens alike."

Read More

—Former Chief Tom Younce, North Carolina State University Police Department

“I have been with this department for more than 25 years. I have seen a vast transition and difference come about as a result of our CALEA accreditation.”

Read More

—Chief James Chavis, Kannapolis (NC) Police Department

“I would like to thank the Commission very much. Accreditation is a way of life for us. It has reduced our liability cost and made my risk managers very happy.”

Read More

—Sheriff Timothy Dunning, Douglas County (NE) Sheriff’s Office

"CALEA Accreditation gave our personnel a focus and direction with specific and measurable goals.  Self assessment is invaluable and on many occasions we found more efficient ways to discharge our duties, providing contemporary and professional law enforcement services." 

Read More

—Chief Mark Palmer, Coventry (CT) Police Department

"CALEA Accreditation has proven itself time and time again...and the respect and support generated within our community for our services have been positively impacted by the program, making us a truly professional agency."

Read More

—Sheriff Thomas Brown, Jr., Dekalb County (GA) Sheriff's Office

“Accreditation helps us make our law enforcement management systems work smoothly. It assists us with developing our employees and provides police officers with a superior foundation and enables them to provide outstanding services to the community.  I am proud of the men and women of the Avon Police Department for providing that superior level of service to our community.” 

Read More

—Chief Mark Rinaldo, Avon (CT) Police Department

“The key to CALEA Accreditation is peer review of our policies, procedures and practices.  This promotes professional excellence as we strive to be our very best.  The process results in a total team effort that contributes positively to any agency’s effectiveness and ability to solve problems and deliver services.  We have bought into this process since the early 1990’s and remain committed.  I look forward to many years as a CALEA Accredited agency.” 

Read More

—Chief Kimberley Crannis, Blacksburg (VA) Police Department

"CALEA Accreditation has prompted the Corpus Christi (TX) Police Department to closely scrutinize the policies and procedures governing the way we do business. Many policies have been updated/altered/initiated because of the influence of CALEA. Working closely with the city Legal Department and the city Human Resources Department, we are confident that we can better withstand the scrutiny of lawsuits and grievances and at the same time offer our employees a fair and consistent work environment."

Read More

—Chief Troy Riggs, Corpus Christi (TX) Police Department

"The assessors did an excellent job of providing feedback to my agency on our performance. In today’s environment with an economic downturn this is not the time to think about giving up accreditation; it is even more important to retain accreditation as the CALEA process represents our roadway to professionalism."

Read More

—Sherrif Robert Peryam, Monroe County (FL) Sheriff's Office

"Although the CALEA process is institutionalized with my agency, we learn something about our agency each time we have a CALEA assessment.  Our employees have an understanding of their duties that comes with adhering to standards over the years." 

Read More

—Chief Wren Johnson, Morehead City (NC) Police Department

"I would not send my kids to a school or a hospital that was not accredited, and I think the citizens of Columbia County deserve the professional delivery of services by my office that is embodied by the CALEA standards."

Read More

—Sheriff Clay Whittle, Columbia County (GA) Sheriff's Office

"The CALEA Campus Security Accreditation Program provides an opportunity for college and university non-sworn agencies to become more professional and respected by their administration, students, faculty, staff and surrounding law enforcement departments."

Read More

—Chief Gary Lyle , Anne Arundel (MD) Community College

"Had it not been for CALEA we would not have been as organized or able to adapt and respond to the floods.  CALEA was responsible for enabling the Munster Police Department to respond. I hope agencies realize that in difficult times CALEA can be the lifeline."

Read More

—Chief Stephen Scheckel, Munster (IN) Police Department

"First and foremost, the standards represent what are considered to be good business practices for training academies. It is not a one-time temporary process.  It is the way the agency has been and will continue to do business. A highly prized recognition of professionalism and excellence." 

Read More

—Commissioner John W. Bizzack, PhD., Kentucky Department of Criminal Justice

“With the CALEA-based blueprint in place, we now have a means to continually develop, review and adjust our efforts to meet the best practices and standards in the industry. We will continue to partner with CALEA and other accredited agencies to meet the dynamic changes of our profession and the needs of our growing community.”

Read More

—Chief Paul Willingham, University of Houston - Clear Lake (TX) Police Department

"Our department has been in the accreditation business for over twenty-six years. While it was very challenging in the beginning, it has now become a part of our daily lives. Today, 93% of our officers and employees began their career with a nationally accredited department. Meeting the standards is no longer a challenge but an invitation for new ways to improve existing processes. We consider it an honor to be a long standing member of the CALEA family."

Read More

—Chief Elaine P. Snow, Rome (GA) Police Department

"The City of Keller, Texas residents approved a 15 Year Crime Control and Prevention Sales Tax dedicated to the Keller Police Department and one of the expenditure requirements was to continue to fund the CALEA Accreditation program. The taxpayers noted the improvements in the overall management and performance in their police department since the department received the initial award in 2006."

Read More

—Chief Mark R. Hafner, Keller (TX) Police Department

"When our agency was at a strategic inflection point, we first used CALEA Recognition and then Accreditation as the tool to turn things around. Simply, we had to change, and that change had to be significant and done in a timely fashion. We used the CALEA Standards to guide us as we made changes in practice, procedures and policies."

Read More

—Chief Thomas E. Engells, Univ. of Texas Medical Branch Police Department

"Let me just briefly give you a broader municipal perspective of how we value and utilize our CALEA accredited status: CALEA Accreditation helps our risk management efforts and is an important part of our group insurance rating and, conversely, our costs. Being CALEA accredited also helps our bond rating. It is a rating we share with only 5% of cities in the United States. Moody’s loves CALEA Standards and so do our bond holders. Accreditation is an important part of our recruiting package for economic development; it makes a strong statement about our community and its values.

Read More

—Valerie Salmons, Village Administrator, Village of Bartlett, IL

View All

Subscribe to CALEA E-Communiqué

Founding Associations

IACP LogoThe National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE) LogoNation Sheriff Association Logo Police Executive Research Forum Logo

CALEA® © 2010
13575 Heathcote Boulevard, Suite 320 Gainesville, Virginia 20155
(703) 352-4225  FAX (703) 890-3126

  • About Us
  • Programs
  • Resources
  • Career Opps
  • Assessors
  • Awards
  • News
  • Forums
  • Privacy Policy